Imaginary votes, and we have time. No reason not to pressure multiple people, after all. Lets scum sit back and relax on days we're pressuring into a mislynch, yeah?
I wouldn't mind seeing Fortuna speak up a bit more, myself. She's a solid player, and while I do get a slight town read from that day one explosion it's still uh... pretty much the only post she's made, I think.
Bax, please show the REASONING here, because I sure as hell can't find it.
Okay, I see a little here.And IV:Vancho cause holy damn is that last post opportunistic. (Bonus points for "you're arguing against that thing that WE TOWNIES agreed upon.")
Apparently, "Do not like" is a reason now?IV: Vancho for this. Do not like.
No justification WHATSOEVER. This looks like an OMGUS vote.I can't believe I missed that post when I was reading. IV: Vancho
"Those reasons were kind of dumb" =/= scum. That is not proper reasoning for a lynch. One sentence is not acceptable.On that note, I guess that Vancho post is pretty suspicious. I mean, those reasons were kind of dumb.
UIV; IV: Vancho
This is okay. It's meh, but okay.Due to that, I'm going to IV: Vancho1 I would like to see more/better reasoning.
.......Real Vote Vancho because majority is on him.
Bandwagon much?
Don't talk about perfection here. I had reasons for voting for Foerumokaz. Those votes I quoted? I see no reasoning. I may have said stupid things, yes, but I see no reasoning up there whatsoever. What I see is a bandwagon. Of six people, which is slightly more than a quarter of the livelist. I thought Foerumokaz was scummy. That was my reason. My reason for saying "I might have to claim" is because I say stupid things sometimes, which are still true. I might have to, I might not. I certainly do NOT have a scummy record, unless you can see anything up there that would suggest so.I see reasoning. It sure isn't perfect, but at this point this isn't just a silly RVS. There are legitimate reasons why you are getting voted for, and the reasons you are providing I don't think are good enough. Perhaps you are just a newbtown here like me, but I at least provide some real reasons why I'm not scum. Maybe you are just busy with exams, that is a perfectly good reason, but when you are under suspicion like this you have to devote some time to the hunt to explain yourself. "Look at these people, these are bad reasons" and "I might have to claim" are certainly not good enough to clear all of your suspicion. You will need to put out more effort than that to clear your scummy record right now.
The Forebody-ness of most your posts sure isn't helping your case at all, either.
"I hope you make the right decision."
<:/
Gonna have to say IV: Vancho and RV: Vancho for now as well.
Obviously, some of you are operating on a different form of logic than mine, and so I can't follow your thought processes.
That is all. Good night. I hope I wake up to some actual scumhunting instead of attacking me for NO GOOD REASON in the morning.
My Stuff:
Stuff I Like:
@deceptive's question
Seastorm hasn't done much, I know there are laptop issues but even before that. Only non-mechanics talk was to defend MathGirl and go after Fortuna
So if we think MathGirl was scum its possible buddying, but without flips this doesnt mean much. Other than that there's not much to go off so null read leaning scum
Sorruy for not posting today guys, i've been pretty sick. I have been keeping up with the posts though, so i'll make a post tomorrow, i'll make sure of it. Sorry again, thanks for understanding.
Sorry about not posting, I wasn't online over the weekend.
Although that doesn't matter.
I'm too busy procrastinating and being lost in this game.
So IV: fF
Because honestly, Vancho was way too obvious a target for random, useless votes without any reasoning behind them for me to go for it.
This post was pretty much just to bring some light onto myself because it looks like by procrastilurking, I've been unnoticed for large amounts of time.
If you really want to scumhunt, you pay attention to lurkers that don't pay attention to you.
Unless you have, and I haven't noticed.
I can't tell, I'm not really paying attention.
"Assume all your scum reads are town, who then is scum?"
Well, in that case... Hm. This is an interesting one.
I guess this would shift the whole paradigm of my readwall, though.
In the unlikely event that this happens, it is probably because the town leaders have been screwing with us this whole time.
This dramatically affects my reads, dropping my towniest down to likely scum, if not super scum. Them scums, bro.
Of course, this also affects my null/lurker reads. Their absence, which doesn't let me get a read on them, brings them closer to null-scum.
Dang, I've never been good at the whole coaligned thing, but I guess Vancho and Foerumokaz would be an obvious choice given how quickly they've been taking to jumping on each other for weird reasons. Vancho seems like the scummier out the two but I kinda really don't like how quickly his wagon built up in a game where nearly a third of the players are scum. But I guess if he was a corrupt juror half of them wouldn't know who he was anyway so I guess I'm cool with just waiting to see how this plays out for now.
Other one that comes is mind is you and Baxbound, just based on the fact that not being able to get nightkilled and having a strong say in who gets lynched for the first few days sounds like a really sweet spot for a corrupt juror to find themselves in. And I guess I'd have to go with you over him just because you're one of the few people I could see being ballsy enough to try something like that. But that's really just a gut feeling and you've both been active enough and generally acting pro-town so whatever.
(I'm sorry, this game's just really had trouble holding my interest so far.)
Huh?
Oh, right. I forgot about that.
...Now that I think about it, since I made that post it's occured to me that a Vancho lynch isn't going to happen today and chances are that problem will either take care of itself because of his claimthreat or we know who to kill when he doesn't die after several days. That said, Vancho is defensive and flaily and might be newbscum.
SO I DID A LITTLE DIGGING ON BAX, AND... I don't know. Nobody immediately seems to be coaligned with him that I can think of. If anything, Deceptive seems to be more coaligned with him than anybody else, and I don't know if that's a sense of trust emanating from the fact that they suspect there's no corrupt voters, or if it's something worse. I could be missing something here definitely, but I've got nothing concrete to say.
as for who to vote...
Yeah, let me give it to you straight. I'm at a bit of a loss. Replacements are falling out of the goddamn sky and it's a little hard to keep people straight.
Fortuna doesn't have a great track record this game, she's lurking, and I don't think there's some outstanding meta reason?
It's not a great lynch but I suppose it will have to do unless we cook up a better idea.
Still need replacements? It's the least I can do.
As for your question, Deceptive. I would have to say out of people not suspecting me, Baxbound would be the most scummiest to me.
Let's look at some posts from D1
One thing that he says is the he promises that he's town. With no way to actually prove of his towniness, it's a really weird thing to say. It's as if he's screaming "Hey guys look at me! I'm town, so don't think I'm scum!"
Another thing he suggests is for Jurors to randomly start voting people, which can easily lead to mislynches with the power that a single vote has in a game like this.
He's also suggesting a specific time for Jurors to reveal themself, and as someone said earlier, this could be anti-town because it would leave a specific time for any Corrupt Jurors to wait for so they could become the voters.
Now another post.
He's setting more guidelines for Jurors to be allowed to vote. This can look towny, but if you look at it as if Baxbound was scum, then it looks really scummy. I would say that the post gives him town points if he did not fall into the categories of people allowed to be Jurors, but he specifically made some requirements just so he fit into them. It limits a lot of the player base, while leaving him a secure spot on the Jury. He actually admits this later in.
This post says he wasn't sure about of his posts. If he was being honest about his statement, then he broke his own rules, because only a few posts earlier, he posted
Looking at Baxbound as if he were scum puts what he posted in a completely new light.
As for who I think is most scummiest that is suspicious of me, it's the person I'm IVing right now.
Click on the spoiler for a link to an incredibly cool card game or to look at an interesting adventure!
This is pretty good question. I know that the scum PRs know who each other are and that they don't know who the Corrupt Jurors are. Brief glance at the rules and it not clear to me if Corrupt Jurors know each other and/or the PRs? Can anyone help me there? That would help me in spotting possible scum plays.
Anyway, I like working with and trying to form several different kinds of scum teams:
My top scum read is Foerumokaz right now. Who could be on his scum team? Well, looking at the opposing wagon I could see Pharas or amymist as trying to increase the Vancho pressure to take away from the Foerum train. Note that amymist was on Mathgirl yesterday and D1 lynches are typically town so that's not in his/her favor. For bussing scumbuddies, Tea maybe? Wagon might be too small for bussing to be going on.
If Vancho is scum, then by that same opposing wagon logic, feralFantom kind of fits the bill. I'd pick amymist for the busser. Guess I think amymist could be a good 2nd place scum.
We probably have at least one or two scum lurkers/replacements already so: Fortuna, Fragosump, cherushz,and Airey are all scum candidates in my opinion for low posting/replacing. No real evidence of cooperation in these cases however.
~ATH and Crilly are kind of not on my radar, so they are in my "try to remember to look at them harder" category.
That may not be exactly what you are looking for, but those are my thoughts.
Just so everybody knows,
Fortuna has requested replacement and is #4.
I don't even know anymore. Used to contain links to my old forum games, but... yeah.
Balls, I was going to push a lynch on Fortuna for being lurky, defensive, and the mathgirl thing.
Wut?I would have to say out of people not suspecting me, Baxbound would be the most scummiest to me.
He's obviously not serious. Well, I mean I think he was telling the truth but him saying that he's town in that way was obviously a joke. "So I will say now that I am a town, on my Dad's Grave's Mother's Uncle's Chest's Refrigerator's, Coffin, I am a town." Who would take that as someone acting serious? (Someone jokingly claiming scum though is a whole different can of worms however.)One thing that he says is the he promises that he's town. With no way to actually prove of his towniness, it's a really weird thing to say. It's as if he's screaming "Hey guys look at me! I'm town, so don't think I'm scum!"
Except that is not what he said at all. Accusations =/= equal votes. And we did quite frankly need something of the like in order to get going and out of mechanics bullshit.Another thing he suggests is for Jurors to randomly start voting people, which can easily lead to mislynches with the power that a single vote has in a game like this.
The suggestion isn't in and of itself scummy so much as it is not the very best play for town. Like this part looks like you took one post and tried to twist every part into looking scummy.He's also suggesting a specific time for Jurors to reveal themself, and as someone said earlier, this could be anti-town because it would leave a specific time for any Corrupt Jurors to wait for so they could become the voters.
Except I asked for guidelines. Also this can look towny but if he is scum this looks scummy is what. That is an incriminating way of saying a null tell. Seriously, if you're scum I have to commend you on a masterful job of twisting calling something a null tell into incriminating shit. I do agree that baxbound would look a bit better if he didn't fall into his own guidelines but not by much.He's setting more guidelines for Jurors to be allowed to vote. This can look towny, but if you look at it as if Baxbound was scum, then it looks really scummy. I would say that the post gives him town points if he did not fall into the categories of people allowed to be Jurors, but he specifically made some requirements just so he fit into them. It limits a lot of the player base, while leaving him a secure spot on the Jury. He actually admits this later in.
This post says he wasn't sure about of his posts. If he was being honest about his statement, then he broke his own rules, because only a few posts earlier, he posted
Looking at Baxbound as if he were scum puts what he posted in a completely new light.
Except baxbound literally more than doubled the amount of required posts at the point so I'm pretty sure that while not having hard info saying he was ok to vote he had a decent idea. And yes, baxbound is totally saying in thread "MathGirl is the easier mislynch I can get."
This post is made so much worse by the fact that not only is baxbound my biggest town read but that he should be so obvious town to everybody. Baxbound is the most obvious derp town (no offense,baxbound, you're more new than derpy really). Like you should at least consider he is scum but he is so obviously not and amoung the people not suspecting you he's your biggest scum read? I wasn't suspecting you and I should probably be scummier to you than him. Like I've been towning it up but baxbound has just been waving his town boner in our faces all game.
The thing is I'm not even sure if this post is a scummy. It is going against the grain which scum usually don't like to do. Then again if foerum is scum he's going active scum route which means he's more likely to go against the grain. Fighting townfirms is a thing scum like to do. Maybe foerum thought baxbound was derpy enough that he could at least make him less trusted? Blah, I don't know what to make of this post besides that I hate it.
I kind of don't want to lynch Vancho, at least not today. Like if he's town he's probably a pr so that means a couple of things. One, more days means more info for him to give us before he croaks or more days guard protecting me and baxbound. Two, if he's town or a corrupt juror scum prs will be very tempted to kill him. Sitting on vancho for a few days has those benefits. Downside to doing that is that if he's a scum pr (which seems way more likely than corrupt juror to me at least) then he gets a few more nights with his night action.
I kind of almost still want to lynch Fortuna, or Sonic. This reminds me of Wild Westfia where I pegged all of the scum (except the traitor) day one and then left half of them alive the whole game because they replaced out and no one replaced back in.
I think I'm against a foerum lynch because at least he's posting.
EBWOP:
Oh, and Wild Westfia was a LegendaryQ game too. God damn it, it keeps happening.
Fortuna is my preference for the lynch out of the two.
Deceptive Questiontime answers
My top three town reads are, Deceptive, Bax and Tea, if Tea scum it wouldnt change my town reads on the other two since i havnt really drawn a connection from tea to any of them. If Deceptive is scum i would watch bax a bit closer since there might be a connection there but i can see it as only one way. Bax scum wouldnt change my reads too much.
Actually, as much as I'd like the Fortuna slot to speak, its a little unfair to lynch a slot that has yet to be filled.
However, what I would like to be done is for us to look at Anacreon again. A large portion of her posts have been really small and not really done much, and she isn't scum hunting. She just keeps posting on why certain people are not scum.
UIV; IV: Anacreon
Yep, still not happy with a Vancho lynch. Pretty happy with an Anacreon lynch.
Like, i have 2, maybe 3 town reads, and everyone else is null. There is not much talking. This is not good.
Wow. This is kinda silly:
DarcyDerping: woo you posts
DarcyDerping: i was about to prod you butr i guess i did it with my mind
DarcyDerping: tea
DarcyDerping: let's put some shit in perpestive
DarcyDerping: perspective*
A Killer Cuppa Tea: which shit?
DarcyDerping: the posting
DarcyDerping: ok
DarcyDerping: there are 21 pages
DarcyDerping: game started on page 4
DarcyDerping: so that is 17 pages
DarcyDerping: i have 68 posts
DarcyDerping: baxbound has 63
A Killer Cuppa Tea: i prolly have a lot less
DarcyDerping: together we have 131
DarcyDerping: that is over 5 pages
DarcyDerping: that is a bit less than a third
DarcyDerping: right htere
A Killer Cuppa Tea: lol
DarcyDerping: you have 40
A Killer Cuppa Tea: whos third highest?
DarcyDerping: you at 40
A Killer Cuppa Tea: what
A Killer Cuppa Tea: how the fuck am i third highest
A Killer Cuppa Tea: I HAVE EXAMS
A Killer Cuppa Tea: I'VE BARELY BEEN PPSTING
A Killer Cuppa Tea: WHAT THE FUCK
A Killer Cuppa Tea: fuck sakes
A Killer Cuppa Tea: ok im gonna
DarcyDerping: I DO TOO TEA
A Killer Cuppa Tea: say this in the topic
DarcyDerping: I HAD AN EXAM TODAY
A Killer Cuppa Tea: jeezre
DarcyDerping: AND I SPENT ALL DAY STUDYING TOO
DarcyDerping: copy paste the whole post part of this conve
DarcyDerping: convo*
DarcyDerping: once i finish
DarcyDerping: my point
DarcyDerping: so add you on to me and baxbound
A Killer Cuppa Tea: ok
DarcyDerping: and that is 171, just 4 posts short of 8 pages
DarcyDerping: and page 21 is 4 posts short anyways
DarcyDerping: so that is 8/17 pages right there
DarcyDerping: slightly under half
DarcyDerping: half a page under half of all posts
DarcyDerping: add on pharas, the 4th highest
DarcyDerping: that is 29 more posts
DarcyDerping: that adds a whole page
DarcyDerping: brings us to over 9 pages
DarcyDerping: 9/17, over half
A Killer Cuppa Tea: so the top 4 posters
DarcyDerping: top 2 posts have a third of all posts, top 4 half over half
A Killer Cuppa Tea: are over half the game
DarcyDerping: have*
DarcyDerping: in a 25 man game
DarcyDerping: the fifth highest poster is the mod
DarcyDerping: ok, now go copy paste this
A Killer Cuppa Tea: ok, im posting from
A Killer Cuppa Tea: DarcyDerping: woo you posts
Wow, thats brilliant. We're never going to get anywhere if the top 4 posters are us, though. Thats kind of pathetic.
By the way, know what this is? This is our post pile getting taller while we're complaining about being over half of all the posts. God damn it post people.